Lines to plug NYC into green power to be buried or submerged

Aug 17, 2021

There’s a disconnect in the drive to make New York state less reliant on fossil fuels

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — There's a disconnect in the effort to make New York state less reliant on fossil fuels.

Solar farms, wind turbines and hydro dams are producing more renewable power for the state, but it can be difficult to deliver that power south to the massive New York City market.

So state officials are considering proposals to effectively plug the city into more green power through high-voltage transmission lines that would run underground or underwater for more than 100 miles (161 kilometers).

Different proposed lines would go beneath the Hudson River or be buried along the state Thruway. One long-planned line would run down the entire state to deliver hydropower from Canada.

The proposals are designed to bring New York state a big step closer to its goal of relying on renewable sources for 70% of its power by 2030. The Cuomo administration this year offered incentives to build the lines after analysts concluded it would be difficult to hit the statewide goal without targeting New York City, which relies heavily on fossil fuel.

That reliance is expected to increase in the short term because of the recent closure of Indian Point nuclear facility just north of the city.

“We’re going to need more efficiency. We’re going to need more rooftop solar. We’re going to need offshore wind. But we also are likely really going to need power from upstate and north of New York in order to meet our objectives,” said Julie Tighe, president of the New York League of Conservation Voters.

Transmission constraints in the electrical grid currently limit the ability to send more renewable energy downstate. Backers of the proposed transmission lines say they could help solve that problem by tapping into the grid north of the congestion.

The state will provide incentives through the purchase of “renewable energy certificates” representing the new clean power sent into the grid.

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority is reviewing plans for transmission lines from seven bidders. Multiple bids are for 1,200 megawatt direct current lines, which could provide an estimated 15% of the city’s electricity needs.

The energy company Avangrid's proposed Excelsior Connect would run from the Monticello in the Catskills to a substation in Queens, underground along the state Thruway for part of its route.

Rise Light & Power's Catskills Renewable Connector would be buried under the Hudson River from south of Albany on its way to the company's Ravenswood Generating Station in Queens.

Ravenswood, the city's largest fossil fuel plant, is the sort of facility the state is looking to displace with the transmission line. The company's chief executive officer, Clint Plummer, said they would literally bulldoze part of the facility to make room for this new clean energy infrastructure.

“We recognize that change has to be made,” Plummer said. “We’re fully committed to being part of that solution.”

The Champlain Hudson Power Express would draw power farther north from Quebec. The line would stretch for more than 300 miles (483 kilometers) in New York, run down Lake Champlain, then underground before going under the Hudson River.

The long-planned project from Transmission Developers Inc. already has state and federal permits, meaning it could be in service by the end of 2025, said company chief executive officer Donald Jessome. He added that while wind and solar power are intermittent, hydropower can provide a steady baseload energy.

“It's a renewable resource, but probably one of its most important benefits is that it’s 365, 24/7,” Jessome said.

Proposals to bury a cable under the Hudson River have raised some concerns.

Towns that draw water from the river are worried about contaminants churning up during construction. The environmental group Riverkeeper worries that magnetic fields generated by cables could interfere with the ability of fish to navigate in the river.

Bidders say their projects will be environmentally sound.

But Riverkeeper's opposition to the CHPE proposal also centers on the importation of Canadian hydropower, which they say is damaging to rivers and has had a negative impact on Indigenous communities in those areas. Riverkeeper’s John Lipscomb said one concern is that the project could create an incentive for more hydroelectric dams.

Hydro-Quebec, which already exports energy to New York, has no plans to build more dams and has long been collaborating with First Nations, said spokesperson Serge Abergel.

NYSERDA's request for proposals specifies hydropower is allowed only from dams that were already built or under construction by June 2020.

Agency officials could choose one or more bids in the coming weeks to present to regulators for final approval as they look toward “supercharging the state’s new transmission highway.”

More News

Record El Niño? Depends who’s counting
Oct 19, 2026
Record El Niño? Depends who’s counting

WASHINGTON — Britain’s Met Office says this year’s El Niño is “unprecedented.” Japan’s weather agency has called it the strongest ever observed. US forecasters say it still trails the biggest events in its record books. How can they all be right? The answer lies in how they measure El Niño’s strength, with meteorological agencies using different methods to assess the climate phenomenon that make direct comparisons difficult. “By any measure, we are looking at a very strong El Niño,” climate scientist Emily Becker of the University of Miami told AFP, adding that only once it is over will scientists be able to assess how big it is and “where it fits in the context of history.” Natural climate driver  The Pacific Ocean’s El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is the planet’s main natural climate driver. Normally, trade winds blow east to west along the equator, pushing warm water from South America toward Asia, while cold water rises from the depths to replace it. READ: El Niño affects over 451,000 people in PH – NDRRMC El Niños, which occur every two to seven years on average and last nine to 12 months, disrupt this pattern. The trade winds weaken and warm water is pushed back east toward the Americas. That shift in where ocean heat is released into the atmosphere ripples across global weather, making some regions cooler and wetter and others hotter and drier. In describing the El Niño as unprecedented, the Met Office points to raw temperatures in the Pacific. “Our observations confirm that sea-surface temperatures in the central equatorial Pacific have now surpassed levels recorded during previous El Niño events,” it said in a statement to AFP. But absolute temperatures are just one way of measuring El Niño’s strength. Agencies also look at anomalies — how far temperatures rise above a historic baseline — to assess the event. The Japan Meteorological Agency last week declared this El Niño the strongest on record based on how far sea surface temperatures were above normal in the Niño3 region of the eastern Pacific. By its count, the event beat 1997 in observations going back to 1949. The US watches a neighboring box, Niño3.4, in the east-central Pacific. It declares an El Niño when temperatures there run at least 0.5C above normal and the atmosphere responds, weakening the trade winds and shifting tropical rainfall eastward. This process is known as “ocean-atmosphere coupling.” Accounting for climate change  How “normal” is defined has been a matter of significant debate. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other agencies including the UN’s World Meteorological Organization long used the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), which compares temperatures to a 30-year average that is updated every five years, so that the baseline keeps pace with a warming climate. READ: Super El Niño demands urgent, science-based governance  But with climate change speeding up and warming oceans worldwide, NOAA now uses the Relative Oceanic Niño Index (RONI), and the WMO is in the process of switching. RONI also relies on a 30-year average but goes on to measure how warm or cool the east-central Pacific is compared to the rest of the tropical ocean, because it is that difference that drives the weather impacts we care about. “We were finding a mismatch between the temperature of the tropical Pacific and the impacts,” said Becker about the old index. La Niña years, when the central and eastern tropical Pacific is cooler than normal, were producing stronger effects than their rating suggested, and El Niños weaker ones. NOAA projects this El Niño will be the strongest in its records, which go back to 1950, if the three-month average RONI anomaly reaches 2.5C or higher, a level that would put it above the 1982-83, 2015-16, and 1997-98 events. The chances are rated “high,” but not yet certain. “Regardless of where we’re ranking or how we’re measuring this event, it’s an incredible opportunity to study and understand this very powerful phenomenon in the context of a warming world,” said Becker. /dl

Expert Features

The Expert Features reports on the issues and the world’s everyday news. Handled by experts in different niches, you will find different subjects and perspectives.