Heavy-duty Tires Market 2018-2026 | Size, Share, Opportunities and Forecast | Credence Research

Apr 12, 2019

The heavy-duty tires market registered market value of US$ 18.6 Bn in 2017 and estimated to grow with a CAGR of 4.2% during the forecast period from 2018 to 2026.

SANJOSE, United States - April 12, 2019 /MarketersMedia/ —

According to a new market research report published by Credence Research "Heavy-duty Tires Market – Growth, Future Prospects, and Competitive Landscape, 2018-2026," the market for heavy-duty tires registered a market value of US$ 18.6 billion in 2017 and is estimated to grow with a CAGR of 4.2% over the forecast period from 2018 to 2026.

By Application: Construction & Mining, Industrial Equipment, Agricultural and Forestry Equipment
By Distribution Channel: OEM and Aftermarket
By Sales Channel: Direct Retail & Online Retail

Market Insights:
Growth in the infrastructure industry around the globe and especially in the developing region of Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa and Latin America has certainly driven the need for construction and other heavy equipment. As this equipment works in hostile conditions, frequent replacement of consumable parts such as tires is a common phenomenon and therefore the market for heavy-duty tires is growing at a considerable rate and is expected to grow even further in the coming years. Besides tires for construction equipment, tires for other heavy equipment including mining equipment, industrial equipment, and forestry equipment are also experiencing considerable growth in past few years. However, the proliferation of mechanized farming has significantly boosted demand for tire of agricultural equipment such as tractors and harvesters. As a result, growth in off high-way and heavy-duty automotive and equipment is complementing growth for both the new and aftermarket tires market and is projected to grow significantly over the forecast period from 2018 to 2026.

The complete report is available at: https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/heavy-duty-tires-market

Contact Us For Customization in Type, Application & Region: https://www.credenceresearch.com/request-for-customization/59659

Competitive Insights:
The research analysis covers exhaustive analysis of leading heavy-duty tires manufacturers including :
Bridgestone Corporation,
Balkrishna Industries Limited (BKT),
Continental Tires,
Cavi Elettrici e Affini Torino (CEAT),
Titan Tire Corporation,
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA (Michelin),
Pirelli & C. S.p.A.,
Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.,
Hankook Tire,
The Yokohama Rubber Company,
Limited,
Xuzhou Armour Rubber Company, Ltd.,
Trelleborg Wheel Systems Czech Republic (Mitas),
MAITECH TIRE SRL,
Apollo Tyres Ltd.

Heavy-duty tire market is highly fragmented however, the market is dominated by few of the most prominent players including Bridgestone Corporation and Michelin. Major heavy-duty tire manufacturers are consistently upgrading their existing product and are involved in developing new product for special equipment and applications. The companies are incorporating different business strategies depending on the regional nature of the market. For instance, these companies revised their product prices in developing region of Asia Pacific and Latin America. However, the companies are introducing new and special purpose tires in developed region of North America and Europe. These companies face fierce competition with their rivals to claim their dominance on the biggest market of Asia Pacific.

Get Sample (Free) @ https://www.credenceresearch.com/sample-request/59659

Table of Content:
..........
2. Executive Summary
...........
3. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Analysis
...........
4. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value, by Application, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
4.1. Overview
4.1.1. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value Share, by Application, 2017 & 2026 (Value %)
4.1.2. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value, by Application, 2016 - 2026 (US$ Mn)
4.2. Construction & Mining Equipment
4.2.1. Global Heavy-duty Tires for Construction & Mining Equipment Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
4.3. Industrial Equipment
4.3.1. Global Heavy-duty Tires for Industrial Equipment Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
4.4. Agricultural Equipment
4.4.1. Global Heavy-duty Tires for Agriculture Equipment Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
4.5. Forestry Equipment
4.5.1. Global Heavy-duty tires for Forestry Equipment Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)

5. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value, by Distribution Channel, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
5.1. Overview
5.1.1. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value Share, by Distribution Channel, 2017 & 2026 (Value %)
5.1.2. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value, by Distribution Channel, 2016 - 2026 (US$ Mn)
5.2. OEM
5.2.1. Global OEM Heavy-duty Tires Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
5.3. Aftermarket
5.3.1. Global Aftermarket Heavy-duty Tires Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)

6. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value, by Sales Channels, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
6.1. Overview
6.1.1. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value Share, by Sales Channel, 2017 & 2026 (Value %)
6.1.2. Global Heavy-duty Tires Market Value, by Sales Channel, 2016 - 2026 (US$ Mn)
6.2. Direst Retail
6.2.1. Global Direct Retail for Heavy-duty Tires Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
6.3. Online Retail
6.3.1. Global Online Retail for Heavy-duty Tires Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)

7. North America Heavy-duty Tires Market Analysis, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
..........
8. Europe Heavy-duty Tires Market Analysis, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
............
9. Asia Pacific Heavy-duty Tires Market Analysis, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
............
10. Rest of World (RoW) Heavy-duty Tires Market Analysis, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
..............
11. Company Profiles
11.1. Bridgestone Corporation
11.2. Balkrishna Industries Limited (BKT)
11.3. Continental Tires
11.4. Ceat Tires
11.5. Titan Tire Corporation
11.6. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
11.7. Michelin
11.8. Pirelli
11.9. Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.
11.10. Hankook Tire
11.11. Yokohama
11.12. Armour Tires
11.13. Mitas
11.14. Maitech Tire
11.15. Apollo
........................toc continued

The complete report is available at https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/heavy-duty-tires-market

About Us
Credence Research is a worldwide market research and counseling firm that serves driving organizations, governments, non legislative associations, and not-for-benefits. We offer our customers some assistance with making enduring enhancements to their execution and understand their most imperative objectives. Over almost a century, we've manufactured a firm extraordinarily prepared to this task.

Related Reports by Credence Research:

Bicycle Tires Market By Product Type (Tubed Tires, Tubeless Tires, Airless Tires), By Application (On-Road Application, All Terrain Application) - Growth, Future Prospects And Competitive Analysis 2017 – 2025

Airless Tires Market By Application (Two-Wheelers, Agricultural & Construction Equipment, Commercial Vehicles, Defense Vehicles, Utility Vehicles) - Growth, Future Prospects And Competitive Analysis, 2017 - 2025

Aircraft Tires Market By Tire Type (Type III, Type VII Aircraft Tires, Type VIII (Three Part Type) Aircraft Tires, Metric Aircraft Tires), By Design (Bias Ply Aircraft Tires, Radial Ply Aircraft Tires), By Tire Assembly (Tubeless Tires, Tubed Tires), By Tire Tread (New Treaded Tires, Retreaded Tires), By End-user (Commercial, Defense), By Aircraft Type (Fixed Wing Aircrafts, Rotary Wing Aircrafts) - Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2018 – 2026

Automotive Tires Market (Tire Type – Fuel Efficient, High Performance, All-terrain/Off-road, Run-flat and Trailer; Tire Size – 12-14”, 15-17”, 18-22: Above 22”; Design; Tire Assembly; Aspect Ratio; Season; Sales Channel; Vehicle Class) – Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2018 – 2026

Contact Info:
Name: Chris Smith
Email: Send Email
Organization: Credence Research
Address: 105 N 1st ST #429, SAN JOSE,, CA 95103, United States
Phone: 18003618290
Website: https://www.credenceresearch.com

Source URL: https://marketersmedia.com/heavy-duty-tires-market-2018-2026-size-share-opportunities-and-forecast-credence-research/502176

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 502176

More News

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps
Oct 26, 2026
Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

“It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it's not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician,” The 19th’s Grace Panetta said on Vox’s Today, Explained podcast. | Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images Democrats have been emphasizing lots of issues in the runup to the 2026 midterms: The Iran war. The state of the economy and healthcare. Corruption. And…hotness. Specifically, their candidates: The internet is awash in clips of Michigan candidate Abdul El-Sayed pumping iron and podcasters proclaiming that “America deserves a hot president” in a video interspersed with photos of Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff. Having a good-looking candidate is by no means a new tactic — famously, it may have helped John F. Kennedy win election over Richard Nixon — but the online left is adapting that strategy for the internet and fandom age.  Grace Panetta, a politics reporter for The 19th, wrote about how “thirst edits” of Ossoff in particular are proliferating online. Panetta says the organic origins of a lot of these videos are of particular interest to Democratic operatives, who see it as a way to gain back ground they lost on the internet after the 2024 election.  Panetta spoke with Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram about who’s thirsting over Democratic politicians in the first place, how 2026’s hot candidates are different from those of yore, and whether it’s actually giving them a boost.  Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Where are these edits coming from? Regular online creators. And it’s important to note at the outset that these are not paid partnerships. The campaign is not paying these influencers to make edits about how they think their candidate’s really attractive.  That’s partly why I wanted to dig into it, because it’s organic. These are just online creators wanting to draw visibility and attention to a candidate that they really like. Jon Ossoff is currently running for reelection in these midterms. How do we know for sure that he isn’t somehow behind the campaign? I spoke to several creators who make these videos and they said that they’re doing it for the love of the game and they’re just supporters. His campaign did not give me a quote or a statement for this story. So it’s fair to assume that he’s not directly involved and he doesn’t repost these videos.  But as people pointed out to me, his campaign knows that they have an attractive, compelling candidate. And they’ve previously been vaunted for their digital strategy this cycle of putting out very high-quality livestreams of his rallies. There’s a lot of material for an enterprising TikToker who wants to make these edits or clips. They have a lot to work with.  His campaign, as one person put it, is definitely playing into that, but not directly engaging. It’s a fine line to walk. Is it just an Ossoff thing or is this going on with other candidates? I do recall that Abdul El-Sayed hits the gym. Famously so. Yes, he hits the gym. I just watched so many videos for this story. I also came across a fair number of Gavin Newsom edits. There are people who think he gives sort of a Patrick Bateman, American Psycho vibe. There are also official Democratic accounts, including the TikTok account for the DNC, the headquarters account, which was formerly Kamala HQ, who have been posting edits of Ossoff and also Abdul El-Sayed, who kind of leans into this gym-bro persona.  The headquarters account posted a side-by-side of Ossoff and Abdul El-Sayed with the caption, “There are 69 days until election day.” Nice. Yes. There are also lots of edits of Mamdani, and former President Barack Obama. Obama nostalgia content goes hard on the internet. So you’re seeing these more official side Democratic campaign accounts leaning into it and playing up their candidates. Having an attractive candidate is nothing new. You mentioned Obama. JFK was famously dashing. What feels different about what you’re seeing now on social media? I think this is really a culmination of a lot of different things happening right now in politics and specifically within the Democratic Party.  After their loss in 2024, there was a lot of conversation about the gerontocracy, how we’re governed by a lot of really old people, for the most part, in this century. And also about Democrats’ digital strategy and the aftermath of 2024.  One thing that a lot of people in that digital space have been talking about is how Republicans and the Trump campaign really capitalized on getting that organic engagement on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where a lot of Americans are now going to get at least some of their news, and also engaging with and encouraging the creation of this kind of organic content on platforms and from creators that are not always expressly political or official-side.  “A candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have.” As one Democrat I talked to put it, she thinks it’s a way for Democrats to win back the internet and to really create a contrast with the Republicans. And she said to have fun on the internet because Republicans are having fun on the internet and it appears to be working for them, or at least it was in 2024. Is there something about this being something on the left that makes it sort of tricky? This is, broadly speaking, objectification, right? It is a fine line between thirst and objectification. And there is also a gendered element to it that it is mostly men that these types of videos are being made about.  Now, granted, a lot of people make sort of hype edits or positive content about AOC because she’s a very popular female politician on the left, but it’s true that women candidates are held to higher standards in terms of how they present themselves and how their supporters portray them.  It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it’s not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician. Is there a drawback of focusing on looks? Does it make the Democratic Party or these candidates seem superficial or not that serious? President Trump has been the defining figure in our politics for 10 years now. And he is famously very, very image focused and image obsessed. We live in a very image-obsessed society, and I think there’s kind of a bipartisan acknowledgement of that.  And looks matter to people in all kinds of ways. They do matter in politics, they do matter to voters. Whether you like that that’s the case or not, it is the reality. And I think the way that a lot of people on the left see this is, people want to look at attractive people. People take attractive people more seriously and are more willing to listen to them. So we should play into that and play that up.  That’s also been the case on the right. President Trump famously loves people out of “central casting.” There’s been this whole movement on the right about making conservatism sexy again. And especially at the beginning of the second Trump term, you had all these influencers talking about how the second Trump term was going to usher in this great age of hotness, which is of course very based on sort of stereotypical male-centered Eurocentric beauty standards.  I think the genie’s out of the bottle on this one in terms of the fact that our politics and society is very image-obsessed. And I think the left, being locked out of power, realizes they have to play on those terms and they have fun doing it. You could look at it as giving “Kamala is brat,” which famously did not work. Is it working in any tangible way for Ossoff, for Abdul El-Sayed, or anyone else? I think a lot of the time in politics, the success of a message is really dependent on the broader political situation. I think a part of the reason that the Kamala’s brat thing didn’t work is people were like, “Okay, that’s great, but my gas is too expensive and prices are too high and I’m not happy with how things have gone under the Biden administration, so I don’t really care.” I don’t know that specific digital strategy makes or breaks a campaign or candidate, but it feeds into a bunch of larger factors.  Something that a lot of people I spoke to said they liked about Jon Ossoff is how he is incredibly serious in Senate hearings. He doesn’t grandstand. He really holds Trump administration officials’ feet to the fire. He’s been very focused in his role in the Senate and on the campaign trail about calling out corruption. He’s a very, very gifted speaker and orator. So I think a candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have. And I think people are really unhappy with the second Trump term and politicians being super old and out of touch, and it’s a perfect storm of factors that makes it work for him.

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

Expert Features

The Expert Features reports on the issues and the world’s everyday news. Handled by experts in different niches, you will find different subjects and perspectives.