IROSM Offers Patient Guide on the Arthritis Treatment Gap Ahead of World Arthritis Day

Sep 19, 2026

The Fort Lauderdale practice is making its patient guide, The Healing Code, and a physician video available ahead of World Arthritis Day on October 12, for arthritis patients who fall between standard treatment and joint replacement surgery.

Fort Lauderdale, FL, September 19, 2026 -- The Institute of Regenerative Orthopedics & Sports Medicine (IROSM) is offering its patient guide, "The Healing Code: Your Guide to Regenerative Orthopedics," from its website ahead of World Arthritis Day on October 12, together with a video in which Dr. Jorge Gonzalez explains the "treatment gap" facing arthritis patients. The gap refers to patients who have exhausted conservative non-surgical treatments for osteoarthritis, such as physical therapy, medications, weight management, and corticosteroid injections, but are not yet suitable candidates for joint replacement surgery due to age, lifestyle, or occupational demands.


Arthritis affects an estimated 53.2 million adults in the United States, including an estimated 5.17 million adults in Florida, according to the Arthritis Foundation. Osteoarthritis, the most common form, develops gradually, causing joint pain, stiffness, swelling, and progressive loss of mobility.


Dr. Jorge Gonzalez, a triple board-certified physician at IROSM in Fort Lauderdale, notes that this gap is widely recognized among orthopedic specialists. In his clinical practice, Dr. Gonzalez sees a treatment gap daily among patients with moderate disease progression.


Standard conservative care manages symptoms effectively for many patients. However, when these options lose effectiveness, joint replacement surgery is typically recommended next. While joint replacements are highly successful, artificial joints generally last 10 to 15 years. For middle-aged patients, active professionals, or individuals unable to take extended time off work, undergoing joint replacement too early presents a major dilemma, as it significantly increases the likelihood of complex revision surgeries later in life.


"These are active individuals who have completed every standard non-surgical option, medications, physical therapy, weight loss, and injections, yet continue to live with pain and limited function," said Dr. Gonzalez. "Because of their age or active lifestyle, joint replacement isn't an ideal immediate answer. Without an intermediate step, these patients are often left relying on stronger pain medications, restricting their daily activities, or simply enduring chronic pain."


Dr. Gonzalez explains that orthobiologic treatments, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and autologous stem cell therapies prepared in IROSM's on-site laboratory, are increasingly utilized to bridge this gap. Under U.S. regulatory guidelines, these treatments strictly utilize the patient's own biological material rather than donor tissues.


"It is vital for patients to understand that orthobiologic injections do not cure or reverse arthritis," said Dr. Gonzalez. "However, for appropriately selected candidates, these therapies can meaningfully reduce pain and restore joint function for extended periods with a favorable safety profile, since they use the patient's own cells. It creates a viable bridge to maintain quality of life until they're ready for a joint replacement."


Dr. Gonzalez discusses the treatment gap and patient selection criteria in detail in a video available on IROSM's website.


Arthritis-related pain isn't limited to the knees and hips. At IROSM, neck and lower back pain associated with arthritis is addressed separately by Dr. Michael Erdman, a fellowship-trained interventional pain and spine specialist who treats patients using minimally invasive, image-guided procedures, including epidural injections and radiofrequency ablation.


The orthopedic treatment gap refers to the clinical period when a patient no longer responds to conservative treatments, such as physical therapy, medications, and standard injections, but is not yet a candidate for joint replacement surgery, and while PRP and autologous stem cell therapy do not cure osteoarthritis or rebuild lost cartilage, they can significantly reduce pain and improve mobility for qualifying patients. Candidacy for orthobiologic care is determined through a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of the patient's joint structure, medical history, and functional goals.


IROSM, with locations in Fort Lauderdale and Hialeah, serves patients across South Florida with advanced, image-guided, non-surgical treatment options.


This release is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Individual results vary. Patients should consult a physician to evaluate appropriate treatment options.


About IROSM

The Institute of Regenerative Orthopedics & Sports Medicine (IROSM) is a South Florida practice led by triple board-certified physician Dr. Jorge Gonzalez and fellowship-trained interventional pain and spine specialist Dr. Michael Erdman. IROSM specializes in non-surgical and regenerative treatment options for complex musculoskeletal conditions, including joint, spine, and sports-related pain.


Contact Info:
Name: Dr. Jorge Gonzalez
Email: Send Email
Organization: Institute of Regenerative Orthopedics & Sports Medicine
Website: https://irosm.com

Release ID: 89203744

Should you identify any discrepancies, concerns, or inaccuracies in the content provided in this press release or require assistance with a press release takedown, we strongly urge you to notify us promptly by contacting [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our responsive team is committed to addressing your concerns within 8 hours by taking necessary actions to resolve identified issues diligently or guiding you through the necessary steps for removal. Our dedication lies in providing accurate and reliable information.

More News

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps
Oct 26, 2026
Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

“It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it's not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician,” The 19th’s Grace Panetta said on Vox’s Today, Explained podcast. | Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images Democrats have been emphasizing lots of issues in the runup to the 2026 midterms: The Iran war. The state of the economy and healthcare. Corruption. And…hotness. Specifically, their candidates: The internet is awash in clips of Michigan candidate Abdul El-Sayed pumping iron and podcasters proclaiming that “America deserves a hot president” in a video interspersed with photos of Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff. Having a good-looking candidate is by no means a new tactic — famously, it may have helped John F. Kennedy win election over Richard Nixon — but the online left is adapting that strategy for the internet and fandom age.  Grace Panetta, a politics reporter for The 19th, wrote about how “thirst edits” of Ossoff in particular are proliferating online. Panetta says the organic origins of a lot of these videos are of particular interest to Democratic operatives, who see it as a way to gain back ground they lost on the internet after the 2024 election.  Panetta spoke with Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram about who’s thirsting over Democratic politicians in the first place, how 2026’s hot candidates are different from those of yore, and whether it’s actually giving them a boost.  Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Where are these edits coming from? Regular online creators. And it’s important to note at the outset that these are not paid partnerships. The campaign is not paying these influencers to make edits about how they think their candidate’s really attractive.  That’s partly why I wanted to dig into it, because it’s organic. These are just online creators wanting to draw visibility and attention to a candidate that they really like. Jon Ossoff is currently running for reelection in these midterms. How do we know for sure that he isn’t somehow behind the campaign? I spoke to several creators who make these videos and they said that they’re doing it for the love of the game and they’re just supporters. His campaign did not give me a quote or a statement for this story. So it’s fair to assume that he’s not directly involved and he doesn’t repost these videos.  But as people pointed out to me, his campaign knows that they have an attractive, compelling candidate. And they’ve previously been vaunted for their digital strategy this cycle of putting out very high-quality livestreams of his rallies. There’s a lot of material for an enterprising TikToker who wants to make these edits or clips. They have a lot to work with.  His campaign, as one person put it, is definitely playing into that, but not directly engaging. It’s a fine line to walk. Is it just an Ossoff thing or is this going on with other candidates? I do recall that Abdul El-Sayed hits the gym. Famously so. Yes, he hits the gym. I just watched so many videos for this story. I also came across a fair number of Gavin Newsom edits. There are people who think he gives sort of a Patrick Bateman, American Psycho vibe. There are also official Democratic accounts, including the TikTok account for the DNC, the headquarters account, which was formerly Kamala HQ, who have been posting edits of Ossoff and also Abdul El-Sayed, who kind of leans into this gym-bro persona.  The headquarters account posted a side-by-side of Ossoff and Abdul El-Sayed with the caption, “There are 69 days until election day.” Nice. Yes. There are also lots of edits of Mamdani, and former President Barack Obama. Obama nostalgia content goes hard on the internet. So you’re seeing these more official side Democratic campaign accounts leaning into it and playing up their candidates. Having an attractive candidate is nothing new. You mentioned Obama. JFK was famously dashing. What feels different about what you’re seeing now on social media? I think this is really a culmination of a lot of different things happening right now in politics and specifically within the Democratic Party.  After their loss in 2024, there was a lot of conversation about the gerontocracy, how we’re governed by a lot of really old people, for the most part, in this century. And also about Democrats’ digital strategy and the aftermath of 2024.  One thing that a lot of people in that digital space have been talking about is how Republicans and the Trump campaign really capitalized on getting that organic engagement on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where a lot of Americans are now going to get at least some of their news, and also engaging with and encouraging the creation of this kind of organic content on platforms and from creators that are not always expressly political or official-side.  “A candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have.” As one Democrat I talked to put it, she thinks it’s a way for Democrats to win back the internet and to really create a contrast with the Republicans. And she said to have fun on the internet because Republicans are having fun on the internet and it appears to be working for them, or at least it was in 2024. Is there something about this being something on the left that makes it sort of tricky? This is, broadly speaking, objectification, right? It is a fine line between thirst and objectification. And there is also a gendered element to it that it is mostly men that these types of videos are being made about.  Now, granted, a lot of people make sort of hype edits or positive content about AOC because she’s a very popular female politician on the left, but it’s true that women candidates are held to higher standards in terms of how they present themselves and how their supporters portray them.  It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it’s not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician. Is there a drawback of focusing on looks? Does it make the Democratic Party or these candidates seem superficial or not that serious? President Trump has been the defining figure in our politics for 10 years now. And he is famously very, very image focused and image obsessed. We live in a very image-obsessed society, and I think there’s kind of a bipartisan acknowledgement of that.  And looks matter to people in all kinds of ways. They do matter in politics, they do matter to voters. Whether you like that that’s the case or not, it is the reality. And I think the way that a lot of people on the left see this is, people want to look at attractive people. People take attractive people more seriously and are more willing to listen to them. So we should play into that and play that up.  That’s also been the case on the right. President Trump famously loves people out of “central casting.” There’s been this whole movement on the right about making conservatism sexy again. And especially at the beginning of the second Trump term, you had all these influencers talking about how the second Trump term was going to usher in this great age of hotness, which is of course very based on sort of stereotypical male-centered Eurocentric beauty standards.  I think the genie’s out of the bottle on this one in terms of the fact that our politics and society is very image-obsessed. And I think the left, being locked out of power, realizes they have to play on those terms and they have fun doing it. You could look at it as giving “Kamala is brat,” which famously did not work. Is it working in any tangible way for Ossoff, for Abdul El-Sayed, or anyone else? I think a lot of the time in politics, the success of a message is really dependent on the broader political situation. I think a part of the reason that the Kamala’s brat thing didn’t work is people were like, “Okay, that’s great, but my gas is too expensive and prices are too high and I’m not happy with how things have gone under the Biden administration, so I don’t really care.” I don’t know that specific digital strategy makes or breaks a campaign or candidate, but it feeds into a bunch of larger factors.  Something that a lot of people I spoke to said they liked about Jon Ossoff is how he is incredibly serious in Senate hearings. He doesn’t grandstand. He really holds Trump administration officials’ feet to the fire. He’s been very focused in his role in the Senate and on the campaign trail about calling out corruption. He’s a very, very gifted speaker and orator. So I think a candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have. And I think people are really unhappy with the second Trump term and politicians being super old and out of touch, and it’s a perfect storm of factors that makes it work for him.

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

Expert Features

The Expert Features reports on the issues and the world’s everyday news. Handled by experts in different niches, you will find different subjects and perspectives.