San Antonio Divorce Attorney Joseph Lassen Offers Guidance on Setting Up Holiday Parenting Time During a Divorce

Sep 19, 2026

San Antonio, United States, September 19, 2026 -- As the holiday season approaches, many San Antonio families going through a divorce face a difficult new challenge: figuring out how to divide time with their children during Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's. San Antonio divorce lawyer Joseph Lassen, serving families throughout Bexar County, TX, is offering guidance to help separating parents navigate holiday custody schedules with less conflict and more clarity.

"The holidays are already emotional, and divorce adds another layer to that," said Joseph Lassen, founder of the Law Firm of Joseph Lassen. "I see the same question every year: how do we split time with the kids so everyone feels like the holidays weren't taken away from them? The answer starts with a clear, written parenting plan — not last-minute negotiating."

San Antonio divorce attorney Joseph Lassen, founder of the Law Firm of Joseph Lassen, serving families throughout San Antonio and Bexar County, TX.

Why Holiday Parenting Time Requires Special Planning

Under Texas family law, a standard possession order typically alternates major holidays between parents each year, but the details — pickup and drop-off times, whether holidays are split or alternated in full, and how school breaks factor in — need to be spelled out clearly in the divorce decree or custody agreement. Without specific holiday provisions, parents are left to negotiate on the fly, which often leads to disputes right when families can least afford them.

A San Antonio divorce attorney can help parents build holiday provisions into their agreement that address:

  1. Which parent has the children for Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, and New Year's in even versus odd years

  2. Exact exchange times and locations to avoid confusion

  3. How to handle extended family gatherings, travel, and school holiday breaks

  4. What happens if a parent's work schedule changes around the holidays

  5. A process for resolving disagreements without going back to court


Getting Ahead of Holiday Custody Disputes

"Parents don't need more stress going into the holidays," Joseph Lassen said. "They need a plan that's clear enough that nobody has to guess, and a divorce attorney who will fight for that clarity if it's not being offered voluntarily."

The Law Firm of Joseph Lassen encourages parents who are currently divorcing, or who already have a custody order without clear holiday terms, to address the issue well before the holiday season begins. Waiting until days before a holiday to resolve a scheduling dispute often limits the options available and increases the likelihood of conflict. Families throughout San Antonio and surrounding communities who are going through a divorce or need help establishing or clarifying holiday parenting time can schedule a free consultation with a divorce lawyer at the firm.

Common Questions Parents Ask About Holiday Custody

Does holiday parenting time override the regular custody schedule?

Yes. In most Texas parenting plans, designated holiday periods take priority over the regular week-to-week or weekend schedule, even if that means a parent misses their normal time with the child.

Can holiday parenting time be changed after the divorce is finalized?

It can, but only through a formal modification agreed to by both parents or approved by the court. An experienced divorce attorney can help parents document any temporary or permanent changes properly, protecting both sides from future disputes.

What if the other parent won't agree to a holiday schedule?

When parents can't agree, a Texas court will typically apply the standard possession order's default holiday terms. A divorce attorney can help push for a resolution before the holidays arrive, whether through negotiation, mediation, or a court hearing if necessary.

About The Law Firm of Joseph Lassen

The Law Firm of Joseph Lassen is a San Antonio-based family law practice owned and led by attorney Joseph Lassen, who has practiced law for more than 20 years, beginning his legal career in New York before establishing his firm in San Antonio, Texas. Before becoming an attorney, Joseph Lassen served with the NYPD as a 9/11 first responder and later worked as a prosecutor, an experience he says gives him a distinct, front-line understanding of how the legal system operates from every angle.

As a trusted San Antonio family law attorney, Joseph Lassen and his legal team handle a full range of family law matters, including divorce, high-asset divorce, military divorce, child custody, child support, alimony, and property division. The firm is known for combining aggressive courtroom advocacy with individualized attention, helping clients throughout San Antonio and surrounding communities — including Alamo Heights, Alamo Ranch, Stone Oak, Helotes, Boerne, Bulverde, New Braunfels, Schertz, Selma, and Castle Hills — navigate divorce and family law matters with clarity and confidence.

Contact Info:
Name: Joseph Lassen
Email: Send Email
Organization: The Law Firm of Joseph Lassen
Address: 3519 Paesanos Pkwy #100, San Antonio, TX 78231
Phone: (210) 625-6540
Website: https://jlassenlaw.com/

Release ID: 89203763

Should there be any problems, inaccuracies, or doubts arising from the content provided in this press release that require attention or if a press release needs to be taken down, we urge you to notify us immediately by contacting [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our efficient team will promptly address your concerns within 8 hours, taking necessary steps to rectify identified issues or assist with the removal process. Providing accurate and dependable information is central to our commitment.

More News

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps
Oct 26, 2026
Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

“It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it's not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician,” The 19th’s Grace Panetta said on Vox’s Today, Explained podcast. | Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images Democrats have been emphasizing lots of issues in the runup to the 2026 midterms: The Iran war. The state of the economy and healthcare. Corruption. And…hotness. Specifically, their candidates: The internet is awash in clips of Michigan candidate Abdul El-Sayed pumping iron and podcasters proclaiming that “America deserves a hot president” in a video interspersed with photos of Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff. Having a good-looking candidate is by no means a new tactic — famously, it may have helped John F. Kennedy win election over Richard Nixon — but the online left is adapting that strategy for the internet and fandom age.  Grace Panetta, a politics reporter for The 19th, wrote about how “thirst edits” of Ossoff in particular are proliferating online. Panetta says the organic origins of a lot of these videos are of particular interest to Democratic operatives, who see it as a way to gain back ground they lost on the internet after the 2024 election.  Panetta spoke with Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram about who’s thirsting over Democratic politicians in the first place, how 2026’s hot candidates are different from those of yore, and whether it’s actually giving them a boost.  Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Where are these edits coming from? Regular online creators. And it’s important to note at the outset that these are not paid partnerships. The campaign is not paying these influencers to make edits about how they think their candidate’s really attractive.  That’s partly why I wanted to dig into it, because it’s organic. These are just online creators wanting to draw visibility and attention to a candidate that they really like. Jon Ossoff is currently running for reelection in these midterms. How do we know for sure that he isn’t somehow behind the campaign? I spoke to several creators who make these videos and they said that they’re doing it for the love of the game and they’re just supporters. His campaign did not give me a quote or a statement for this story. So it’s fair to assume that he’s not directly involved and he doesn’t repost these videos.  But as people pointed out to me, his campaign knows that they have an attractive, compelling candidate. And they’ve previously been vaunted for their digital strategy this cycle of putting out very high-quality livestreams of his rallies. There’s a lot of material for an enterprising TikToker who wants to make these edits or clips. They have a lot to work with.  His campaign, as one person put it, is definitely playing into that, but not directly engaging. It’s a fine line to walk. Is it just an Ossoff thing or is this going on with other candidates? I do recall that Abdul El-Sayed hits the gym. Famously so. Yes, he hits the gym. I just watched so many videos for this story. I also came across a fair number of Gavin Newsom edits. There are people who think he gives sort of a Patrick Bateman, American Psycho vibe. There are also official Democratic accounts, including the TikTok account for the DNC, the headquarters account, which was formerly Kamala HQ, who have been posting edits of Ossoff and also Abdul El-Sayed, who kind of leans into this gym-bro persona.  The headquarters account posted a side-by-side of Ossoff and Abdul El-Sayed with the caption, “There are 69 days until election day.” Nice. Yes. There are also lots of edits of Mamdani, and former President Barack Obama. Obama nostalgia content goes hard on the internet. So you’re seeing these more official side Democratic campaign accounts leaning into it and playing up their candidates. Having an attractive candidate is nothing new. You mentioned Obama. JFK was famously dashing. What feels different about what you’re seeing now on social media? I think this is really a culmination of a lot of different things happening right now in politics and specifically within the Democratic Party.  After their loss in 2024, there was a lot of conversation about the gerontocracy, how we’re governed by a lot of really old people, for the most part, in this century. And also about Democrats’ digital strategy and the aftermath of 2024.  One thing that a lot of people in that digital space have been talking about is how Republicans and the Trump campaign really capitalized on getting that organic engagement on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where a lot of Americans are now going to get at least some of their news, and also engaging with and encouraging the creation of this kind of organic content on platforms and from creators that are not always expressly political or official-side.  “A candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have.” As one Democrat I talked to put it, she thinks it’s a way for Democrats to win back the internet and to really create a contrast with the Republicans. And she said to have fun on the internet because Republicans are having fun on the internet and it appears to be working for them, or at least it was in 2024. Is there something about this being something on the left that makes it sort of tricky? This is, broadly speaking, objectification, right? It is a fine line between thirst and objectification. And there is also a gendered element to it that it is mostly men that these types of videos are being made about.  Now, granted, a lot of people make sort of hype edits or positive content about AOC because she’s a very popular female politician on the left, but it’s true that women candidates are held to higher standards in terms of how they present themselves and how their supporters portray them.  It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it’s not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician. Is there a drawback of focusing on looks? Does it make the Democratic Party or these candidates seem superficial or not that serious? President Trump has been the defining figure in our politics for 10 years now. And he is famously very, very image focused and image obsessed. We live in a very image-obsessed society, and I think there’s kind of a bipartisan acknowledgement of that.  And looks matter to people in all kinds of ways. They do matter in politics, they do matter to voters. Whether you like that that’s the case or not, it is the reality. And I think the way that a lot of people on the left see this is, people want to look at attractive people. People take attractive people more seriously and are more willing to listen to them. So we should play into that and play that up.  That’s also been the case on the right. President Trump famously loves people out of “central casting.” There’s been this whole movement on the right about making conservatism sexy again. And especially at the beginning of the second Trump term, you had all these influencers talking about how the second Trump term was going to usher in this great age of hotness, which is of course very based on sort of stereotypical male-centered Eurocentric beauty standards.  I think the genie’s out of the bottle on this one in terms of the fact that our politics and society is very image-obsessed. And I think the left, being locked out of power, realizes they have to play on those terms and they have fun doing it. You could look at it as giving “Kamala is brat,” which famously did not work. Is it working in any tangible way for Ossoff, for Abdul El-Sayed, or anyone else? I think a lot of the time in politics, the success of a message is really dependent on the broader political situation. I think a part of the reason that the Kamala’s brat thing didn’t work is people were like, “Okay, that’s great, but my gas is too expensive and prices are too high and I’m not happy with how things have gone under the Biden administration, so I don’t really care.” I don’t know that specific digital strategy makes or breaks a campaign or candidate, but it feeds into a bunch of larger factors.  Something that a lot of people I spoke to said they liked about Jon Ossoff is how he is incredibly serious in Senate hearings. He doesn’t grandstand. He really holds Trump administration officials’ feet to the fire. He’s been very focused in his role in the Senate and on the campaign trail about calling out corruption. He’s a very, very gifted speaker and orator. So I think a candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have. And I think people are really unhappy with the second Trump term and politicians being super old and out of touch, and it’s a perfect storm of factors that makes it work for him.

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

Expert Features

The Expert Features reports on the issues and the world’s everyday news. Handled by experts in different niches, you will find different subjects and perspectives.